Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
90/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Targeted amplicon survey of Escherichia coli via Illumina MiSeq with hybrid (short + long) read sequencing, delivering 403 million reads (118 billion bases) with good quality (94.6% Q20, 87.1% Q30) and zero N content. The hybrid read strategy enables detection of large insertion sequences, plasmid architectures, and pathogenicity island organization in pathogenic E. coli strains; the 56.5% GC and long-read support resolve complex loci missed by short-read-only approaches. Supports virulence profiling and antibiotic resistance gene identification in clinical isolates via comprehensive genomic context.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0