PRJNA649484

BioProject first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

99/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Large-scale Illumina HiSeq 2500 amplicon study of coral (Mussismilia hispida) yielding 1.2B reads with excellent quality (95.7% Q20), enabling deep strain-level profiling. Low GC content (39.1%) consistent with AT-rich symbiotic or pathogenic targets in this host.

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

Mussismilia hispida

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

134 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 361487592704 reported

total reads 1246846658 reported

n content pct 0.255 measured

pct q20 bases 95.7 measured

pct q30 bases 89.7 measured

gc content pct 39.1 measured

mean read length 148 measured

mean base quality 35.1 measured

adapter content pct 0.01 measured

duplication rate pct 64.54 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 99/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.7 measured ×1 99%

adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 41 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0