PRJNA649814

BioProject first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

72/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

This bacterial WGS from HiSeq X Ten totals 4.2 billion bases with high quality (97.5% Q30) and unusually low GC content (40%). The excellent quality makes it suitable for complete genome assembly of this clinically important pathogen.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Enterococcus faecalis

Instrument

HiSeq X Ten

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

3 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 4208393858 reported

total reads 13935079 reported

n content pct 0.006 measured

pct q20 bases 99.1 measured

pct q30 bases 97.5 measured

gc content pct 40 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 39.9 measured

adapter content pct 1.87 measured

duplication rate pct 41.89 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 72/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 97.5 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 41.89 measured ×0.5 0%

adapter content pct 1.87 measured ×0.4 94%

QC cost 12 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0