← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Macaca mulatta
Instrument
GridION
Platform
OXFORD_NANOPORE
Read type
long-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
152 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
1333039222208
reported
total reads
67014224
reported
mean coverage
459.7
extrapolated
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
5.4
measured
pct q30 bases
0.9
measured
gc content pct
40.1
measured
mean read length
6166.2
measured
mean base quality
7.4
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
0.35
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 68/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
459.7
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
0.9
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
0.35
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
21 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0