Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Amplicon survey of an unspecified metagenome via Illumina HiSeq 2500, producing 30 million reads (14.8 billion bases) with high quality (97.3% Q20, 94.9% Q30) and minimal N-content (0.012%). Suitable for community structure assessment and taxonomic profiling in environmental or clinical samples; the 48.6% GC and excellent base fidelity support direct ASV/OTU assignment with minimal preprocessing. The substantial read depth enables confident detection of rare taxa and permits meta-analytic comparison across similar amplicon datasets when the sample type is clarified.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0