Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
74/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Targeted-capture (WES-like) sequencing of metagenome via Illumina NextSeq 550, producing 306 million short reads (46.5 billion bases) with good quality (93.9% Q20, 92.1% Q30) and low N-content (0.022%). Enables functional metagenomic profiling with reduced off-target sequencing compared to whole-metagenome approaches; the 49% GC reflects diverse microbial composition. The targeted enrichment strategy provides higher depth-of-coverage per target gene compared to shotgun metagenomics, supporting sensitive functional gene discovery and abundance quantification in complex environmental samples.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0