← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
59/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Caenorhabditis tropicalis
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
158 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
193674238209
reported
total reads
774820335
reported
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
88
measured
pct q30 bases
82
measured
gc content pct
44.3
measured
mean read length
151
measured
mean base quality
32.1
measured
adapter content pct
43.25
measured
duplication rate pct
5.9
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 59/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
82
measured
×1
60%
mean base quality
32.1
measured
×0.6
68%
adapter content pct
43.25
measured
×0.4
0%
duplication rate pct
5.9
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
19 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0