← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
mouse gut metagenome
Instrument
Illumina NovaSeq 6000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
16 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
345094648
reported
total reads
1365781
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
90.7
measured
pct q30 bases
56.7
measured
gc content pct
49.7
measured
mean read length
252.7
measured
mean base quality
28.4
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
96.58
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 33/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
56.7
measured
×1
0%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
9 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0