← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
92/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Instrument
HiSeq X Ten
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
171 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
242191838279
reported
total reads
770294257
reported
n content pct
0.006
measured
pct q20 bases
99.2
measured
pct q30 bases
97
measured
gc content pct
65.1
measured
mean read length
147
measured
mean base quality
39.7
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
18.29
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 92/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
97
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
18.29
measured
×0.5
68%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
2.2 min compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0