Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
16S amplicon sequencing of Fusobacterium nucleatum via Illumina NovaSeq 6000, producing 615,000 reads (307 million bases) with good quality (94.7% Q20, 91.5% Q30) and zero N content. Enables oral pathogen strain characterization and virulence marker profiling in this periodontal and systemic disease-associated anaerobe; the 53.6% GC is typical for Gram-negative anaerobes. The smaller read count is offset by the high-fidelity NovaSeq platform and zero contamination, supporting reliable taxonomy and potential plasmid/mobile element identification in this clinically significant bacterium.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0