PRJNA679439

BioProject first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

94/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Illumina NovaSeq 6000 exome capture (WES) of human with 129.2M reads and high quality (98% Q20, 94.5% Q30), suitable for variant discovery and copy-number analysis across captured protein-coding regions. High read quality supports confident rare variant calling.

Data type / assay

WES

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina NovaSeq 6000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

2 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 38765487600 reported

total reads 129218292 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 98 measured

pct q30 bases 94.5 measured

gc content pct 48.9 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 36.1 measured

adapter content pct 1.03 measured

duplication rate pct 25.12 measured

mean target coverage 625.2 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 94/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean target coverage 625.2 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 94.5 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 25.12 measured ×0.5 60%

adapter content pct 1.03 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 56 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0