PRJNA685036

BioProject first seen 2022

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Canis lupus familiaris

Instrument

Illumina NovaSeq 6000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

103 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 9868843362258 reported

total reads 32678289279 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 95.9 measured

pct q30 bases 89.9 measured

gc content pct 41.1 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 35.2 measured

adapter content pct 0.21 measured

duplication rate pct 4.61 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.9 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 35.2 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.21 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 4.61 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 26 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0