PRJNA691534

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

80/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Leishmania enriettii

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 4000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

hybrid (short+long)

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

5 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 8994020225 reported

total reads 13717836 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 97.2 measured

pct q30 bases 92.6 measured

gc content pct 59.4 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 38.4 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 32.11 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 80/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 92.6 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 32.11 measured ×0.5 25%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 16 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0