PRJNA691541

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

47/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Porcisia hertigi

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 4000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

hybrid (short+long)

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

5 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 5990636694 reported

total reads 13774655 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 58.3 measured

pct q30 bases 22.6 measured

gc content pct 54.8 measured

mean read length 7228.2 measured

mean base quality 21.1 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 0.21 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 47/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 22.6 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 0.21 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 19 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0