PRJNA694913

BioProject first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Illumina MiSeq amplicon of mouse with 11.6M reads at high quality (96.7% Q20, 96.3% Q30) but modest total bases, optimized for small gene panels requiring excellent accuracy. Limited throughput indicates targeted application rather than genome-scale survey.

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

Mus musculus

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

59 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 601698854 reported

total reads 11586518 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 96.7 measured

pct q30 bases 96.3 measured

gc content pct 47.4 measured

mean read length 43 measured

mean base quality 37 measured

adapter content pct 0.93 measured

duplication rate pct 3.32 measured

mean target coverage 11.1 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 96.3 measured ×1 100%

adapter content pct 0.93 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 3 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0