← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
human gut metagenome
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
69 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
907360775
reported
total reads
1998149
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
91.4
measured
pct q30 bases
87.3
measured
gc content pct
53.2
measured
mean read length
443.5
measured
mean base quality
34.5
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
90.86
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 67/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
87.3
measured
×1
87%
duplication rate pct
90.86
measured
×0.5
0%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
3 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0