PRJNA703330

BioProject first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

30/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Mouse gut metagenome WGS via HiSeq 4000 from 44 samples totaling 114.9 billion bases (84.9% Q20), supporting microbial genomics with substantial per-sample depth though reduced Q30 rate (72.4%) indicates some quality trade-offs.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

mouse gut metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 4000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

44 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 114860829000 reported

total reads 382869430 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 84.9 measured

pct q30 bases 72.4 measured

gc content pct 41.1 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 33.1 measured

adapter content pct 23.47 measured

duplication rate pct 10.72 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 30/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 72.4 measured ×1 12%

duplication rate pct 10.72 measured ×0.5 92%

adapter content pct 23.47 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 20 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0