← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
61/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WES
Organism
Nepenthes alata
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
125 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
68282599002
reported
total reads
228592309
reported
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
90.8
measured
pct q30 bases
86.3
measured
gc content pct
48.6
measured
mean read length
150
measured
mean base quality
32.9
measured
adapter content pct
29.97
measured
duplication rate pct
22.25
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 61/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
86.3
measured
×1
82%
duplication rate pct
22.25
measured
×0.5
69%
adapter content pct
29.97
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
19 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0