Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
72/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Arabidopsis thaliana amplicon sequencing via NextSeq 550 with massive scale (1.36B reads, 122B bases) and good quality (86.1% ≥Q20, 81.5% ≥Q30). Large-scale plant amplicon dataset despite NextSeq's lower per-base accuracy; supports population genetics and marker-based plant studies.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0