PRJNA71541

BioProject first seen 2017

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

85/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Illumina HiSeq 2000 WGS of filamentous fungus (Neurospora crassa OR74A) with 18.9M reads and moderate quality (94.5% Q20, 90.2% Q30), suitable for genome reconstruction and SNP detection. Lower GC content (35.7%) typical of this organism aids in mapping quality.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Neurospora crassa OR74A

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

2 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 3807909070 reported

total reads 18851035 reported

n content pct 0.016 measured

pct q20 bases 94.5 measured

pct q30 bases 90.2 measured

gc content pct 35.7 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 35.5 measured

adapter content pct 0.96 measured

duplication rate pct 26.34 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 85/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 90.2 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 26.34 measured ×0.5 43%

adapter content pct 0.96 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 16 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0