Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

PRJNA721743

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

98/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Abalone (Haliotis gigantea) RNA-seq on HiSeq X Ten with 392.8 million 150 bp reads (117.9 Gb) at 98.1% Q20 and 94.6% Q30 provides exceptional coverage for mollusk transcriptomics. The 44.4% GC and high base quality enable comprehensive characterization of developmental patterning, environmental stress responses, and metabolic adaptation in this species.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Haliotis gigantea
Instrument
HiSeq X Ten
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
18 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 117853558800 reported
total reads 392845196 reported
n content pct 0.001 measured
pct q20 bases 98.1 measured
pct q30 bases 94.6 measured
gc content pct 44.4 measured
mean read length 150 measured
mean base quality 36.1 measured
adapter content pct 4.13 measured
duplication rate pct 26.88 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 98/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.6 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 36.1 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 4.13 measured ×0.4 88%
duplication rate pct 26.88 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 14 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 80