Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Homo sapiens long-read WGS via PromethION (Oxford Nanopore) generates 66M reads totaling 751B bases at 242× coverage with moderate base accuracy (57.5% ≥Q20), enabling structural-variant and complex-repetitive-region resolution impossible with short reads. Long-read advantage ideal for difficult genomic loci; moderate per-base accuracy requires orthogonal validation for clinical-grade applications.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0