Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Gut metagenome amplicon survey using Illumina MiSeq delivers 49.7M high-quality short reads (99.2% ≥Q20, 96.8% ≥Q30), ideal for high-resolution 16S/18S rRNA community analysis and microbiota comparisons. Excellent base accuracy supports robust OTU/ASV clustering; common search terms: human microbiome amplicon, gut bacterial community profiling.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0