Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

PRJNA726916

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Mouse gut metagenome amplicon sequencing on MiSeq delivered 1.47 million 251 bp reads with 93.6% Q20 and 90% Q30, capturing longer 16S or ITS regions for improved taxonomic resolution. The 55.8% GC is higher than typical 16S amplicons, possibly reflecting over-representation of Firmicutes or fungal sequences; suitable for community composition and alpha-diversity assessment.

Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
mouse gut metagenome
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
10 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 737510288 reported
total reads 1469144 reported
n content pct 0 measured
pct q20 bases 93.6 measured
pct q30 bases 90 measured
gc content pct 55.8 measured
mean read length 251 measured
mean base quality 35.1 measured
adapter content pct 0.06 measured
duplication rate pct 97.42 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 90 measured ×1 100%
adapter content pct 0.06 measured ×0.5 100%
QC cost 2 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 flagged mean score 53