Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Lactuca sativa (lettuce) amplicon sequencing via Illumina MiniSeq yields 15.4M high-quality reads (96.6% ≥Q20, 95.6% ≥Q30), enabling robust crop-plant marker-gene surveys and disease-resistance-locus profiling. Excellent base quality and crop-improvement focus; verify amplicon primers and cross-check plant-specific taxonomic databases for robust annotation.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0