Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Oxford Nanopore MinION long-read RNA-seq of E. coli with 9.9M reads and low per-read accuracy (38% Q20, 11.8% Q30), enabling full-length transcript recovery despite minimal short-read equivalence. Valuable for resolving prokaryotic transcriptome complexity and junction-spanning isoforms.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0