Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
37/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Sanger-equivalent capillary sequencing (AB 310 Genetic Analyzer) of salt-tolerant plant (Eutrema salsugineum) with 3.7M reads and lower quality (74.1% Q20, 59.7% Q30), legacy method suitable for targeted genomic loci or re-analysis of historical datasets. Limited throughput appropriate for focused studies.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0