← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
17/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WES
Organism
Plasmodium falciparum
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 4000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
426 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
136869197860
reported
total reads
456083476
reported
n content pct
13.517
measured
pct q20 bases
72.3
measured
pct q30 bases
68.2
measured
gc content pct
44.5
measured
mean read length
151
measured
mean base quality
27.1
measured
adapter content pct
73.56
measured
duplication rate pct
23.23
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 17/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
68.2
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
23.23
measured
×0.5
66%
adapter content pct
73.56
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
3 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0