Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
86/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Homo sapiens whole-chromosome sequencing (WCS) on NextSeq 500 with 522M reads (72B bases, 23.3× extrapolated depth) and good quality (93.5% ≥Q20, 89.1% ≥Q30). Human genomics dataset supporting population variant discovery and chromosome-scale polymorphism studies.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0