PRJNA749634

BioProject first seen 2022

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

75/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Lactiplantibacillus plantarum hybrid WGS (short+long reads) on HiSeq X Ten with 164M reads and good quality (92.1% ≥Q20, 86.5% ≥Q30). Supports both high-resolution short-read mapping and long-read contig assembly for improved bacterial genome reconstruction.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Lactiplantibacillus plantarum

Instrument

HiSeq X Ten

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

hybrid (short+long)

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

43 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 47445201366 reported

total reads 164182794 reported

n content pct 0.037 measured

pct q20 bases 92.1 measured

pct q30 bases 86.5 measured

gc content pct 43.9 measured

mean read length 145.8 measured

mean base quality 33 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 26.71 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 75/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 86.5 measured ×1 83%

duplication rate pct 26.71 measured ×0.5 42%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 23 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0