← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
82/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina NovaSeq 6000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
6 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
127405002136
reported
total reads
421870868
reported
mean coverage
41.1
extrapolated
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
97.2
measured
pct q30 bases
93.2
measured
gc content pct
46.2
measured
mean read length
151
measured
mean base quality
35.8
measured
adapter content pct
22.98
measured
duplication rate pct
17.71
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 82/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
41.1
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
93.2
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
17.71
measured
×0.5
70%
adapter content pct
22.98
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
21 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0