PRJNA811797
BioProjectProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
45/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mouse (Mus musculus) whole-exome sequencing on MiSeq with 1.85 million unusually long 405.7 bp reads at 98.5% Q20 and 95.4% Q30 suggests merged or overlapping paired-end reads. The 50.7% GC and high base quality support SNP discovery in exonic regions; read-length validation necessary to assess overlapping-read artifacts.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.