← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
77/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Escherichia coli
Instrument
Illumina NovaSeq 6000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
298 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
162320069368
reported
total reads
329016804
reported
mean coverage
35287
extrapolated
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
92.7
measured
pct q30 bases
86.1
measured
gc content pct
51.5
measured
mean read length
151
measured
mean base quality
34.3
measured
adapter content pct
54.74
measured
duplication rate pct
16.15
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 77/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
35287
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
86.1
measured
×1
81%
duplication rate pct
16.15
measured
×0.5
75%
adapter content pct
54.74
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
17 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0