Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

PRJNA860050

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

67/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Alternaria brassicae
Instrument
Illumina NovaSeq 6000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
15 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 132290166960 reported
total reads 465020367 reported
n content pct 0.012 measured
pct q20 bases 99.9 measured
pct q30 bases 99.9 measured
gc content pct 46.9 measured
mean read length 151 measured
mean base quality 30 measured
adapter content pct 24.74 measured
duplication rate pct 23.07 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 67/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 99.9 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 30 measured ×0.6 33%
adapter content pct 24.74 measured ×0.4 0%
duplication rate pct 23.07 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 9 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 flagged mean score 58