Corpus 1,273 assessed · 1,174 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 169 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

PRJNA898879

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

55/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Exceptionally deep human bulk-RNA-seq on HiSeq 4000 with 150 bp reads (4.53 billion total, 1.36 Tb) at remarkable 99.8% Q20 and 99.8% Q30 metrics provides unparalleled sensitivity for transcript detection. The 54.5% GC and minimal N-content enable comprehensive profiling of rare isoforms, allele-specific expression, and single-cell RNA dynamics across complex tissues or developmental programs.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 4000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
88 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 1358389947000 reported
total reads 4527966490 reported
n content pct 0.003 measured
pct q20 bases 99.8 measured
pct q30 bases 99.8 measured
gc content pct 54.5 measured
mean read length 150 measured
mean base quality 29.9 measured
adapter content pct 22.12 measured
duplication rate pct 61.63 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 55/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 99.8 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 29.9 measured ×0.6 32%
adapter content pct 22.12 measured ×0.4 0%
duplication rate pct 61.63 measured ×0.4 30%
QC cost 6 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it mean score 73