Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mus musculus amplicon profiling via Illumina MiSeq yields 14M reads with moderate quality (79% ≥Q20, 62.1% ≥Q30), enabling mouse marker-gene and locus-specific population surveys. Lower Q30 acceptable for presence/absence genotyping and population-structure studies; verify amplicon specificity, primer dimers, and cross-amplification before pooling or analysis.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0