PRJNA917857

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

94/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Salmo salar

Instrument

Illumina NovaSeq 6000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

18 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 843596472300 reported

total reads 2811988241 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 94.5 measured

pct q30 bases 88.7 measured

gc content pct 43.2 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 34.9 measured

adapter content pct 0.56 measured

duplication rate pct 11.63 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 94/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 88.7 measured ×1 94%

duplication rate pct 11.63 measured ×0.5 89%

adapter content pct 0.56 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 19 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0