Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human gut metagenome amplicon survey via Illumina MiSeq delivers 2.6M high-quality reads (97.7% ≥Q20/Q30), enabling precise community composition profiling despite smaller sample size. Exceptional per-base quality compensates for moderate depth; ideal for targeted clinical studies or hypothesis-driven ecological surveys with clear a priori questions.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0