← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 26 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
26 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
metadata only · no data-level QC for this typeStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
proteomics-MS
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Instrument
Orbitrap Fusion Lumos
Metrics (value · how obtained)
experiment type
Shotgun proteomics
reported
submission type
PARTIAL
reported
quantification method
MS1 intensity based label-free quantification method
reported
QC cost
1 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.
1 studies use it
1 flagged mean score 32