Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SAMN12748589

BioSample

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

47/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Oryza sativa Indica Group
Instrument
HiSeq X Ten
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
7 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 89422022935 reported
total reads 150069950 reported
n content pct 0 measured
pct q20 bases 0 measured
pct q30 bases 0 measured
gc content pct 44.8 measured
mean read length 15834.3 measured
mean base quality 0 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 0.02 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 47/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 0 measured ×1 0%
duplication rate pct 0.02 measured ×0.5 100%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 1.1 min compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 99