Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRP000941

ENA first seen 2013

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 5 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

5 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay
methylation
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
AB SOLiD 4 System
Platform
ABI_SOLID
N numbers (samples, groups)
2,207 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 14269581889945 reported
total reads 153274240233 reported
n content pct 0.931 measured
pct q20 bases 52.3 measured
pct q30 bases 29.9 measured
gc content pct 18.8 measured
mean read length 87 measured
mean base quality 18.1 measured
adapter content pct 3.69 measured
duplication rate pct 0.36 measured
How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 29.9 measured ×1 0%
QC cost 9 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 90