Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
69/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mycobacterium leprae whole-genome sequencing via Illumina Genome Analyzer generates 138M short reads with moderate quality (83.8% ≥Q20, 78.4% ≥Q30), enabling variant discovery in this slow-growing pathogen. Elevated N-content (1.8%) and moderate Q30 may affect SNP confidence in the GC-rich repetitive genome; verify quality-filtering thresholds.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0