SRP001389

ENA first seen 2014

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

33/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Taeniopygia guttata (zebra finch) EST sequencing via 454 GS yielding 445 million bases (86.3% Q20), capturing expressed sequence tags for this songbird model; 454 platform and lower quality (25.1% Q30) limit transcript assembly complexity.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Taeniopygia guttata

Instrument

454 GS

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

18 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 445433274 reported

total reads 4076748 reported

n content pct 0.068 measured

pct q20 bases 86.3 measured

pct q30 bases 25.1 measured

gc content pct 38.7 measured

mean read length 108.5 measured

mean base quality 26.3 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 12.46 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 33/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 25.1 measured ×1 0%

mean base quality 26.3 measured ×0.6 0%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 12.46 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 9 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0