Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
44/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Cricetulus griseus (Chinese hamster) bulk RNA-Seq (FL-cDNA) via Illumina Genome Analyzer with 158M reads at moderate quality (93.7% ≥Q20, 71.6% ≥Q30). Full-length cDNA sequencing dataset for mammalian gene structure and isoform characterization.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0