Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
41/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Medicago truncatula whole-genome sequencing from Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx generates 7.2B reads with moderate quality (72.3% ≥Q20, 51.6% ≥Q30), enabling legume-reference-genome variant discovery and assembly. Large read volume suits deep resequencing of crop germplasm; moderate Q30 may complicate SNP filtering in repetitive plant sequences, requiring quality stringency assessment.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0