← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
metadata only · no data-level QC for this typeStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
unidentified;human metagenome
Instrument
454 GS FLX
Platform
LS454
Files available
submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
2,963 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
no
reported
total bases
6747337939
reported
total reads
24202578
reported
QC cost
1 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently