← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 4 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
4 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
31/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Moraxella lacunata
Instrument
454 GS FLX Titanium
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
10,627 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
6210753197502.001
reported
total reads
25338234408
reported
n content pct
0.142
measured
pct q20 bases
89.2
measured
pct q30 bases
79.4
measured
gc content pct
45.3
measured
mean read length
101
measured
mean base quality
32.3
measured
adapter content pct
69.6
measured
duplication rate pct
3.72
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 31/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
79.4
measured
×1
47%
adapter content pct
69.6
measured
×0.5
0%
QC cost
18 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0