← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 13 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
13 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
24/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer II
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
7 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
6214091884
reported
total reads
61353172
reported
mean coverage
2
extrapolated
n content pct
0.073
measured
pct q20 bases
93.9
measured
pct q30 bases
72.8
measured
gc content pct
52.6
measured
mean read length
50
measured
mean base quality
29.8
measured
adapter content pct
0.4
measured
duplication rate pct
27.73
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 24/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
2
extrapolated
×1.2
0%
pct q30 bases
72.8
measured
×1
14%
duplication rate pct
27.73
measured
×0.5
38%
adapter content pct
0.4
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
5 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0