Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
38/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Apis mellifera EST sequencing on 454 GS FLX Titanium yields 6.2M reads with lower Q30 bases (55.7%), capturing expressed-sequence tags for honeybee gene annotation and transcript discovery. 454 read length suits EST assembly; lower accuracy may impair SNP calling, so best reused for qualitative transcript identification and expression-tag mapping.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0