Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
39/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Plasmodium falciparum WGS on Illumina Genome Analyzer II yields 1.6B reads with poor quality (38.2% ≥Q20, 28.4% ≥Q30) and extreme N-content (29.3%), reflecting difficulty in sequencing the AT-rich parasite genome. Substantial quality challenges; recommend advanced assembly polishing, error correction, or orthogonal validation for clinical applications like drug-resistance SNP detection.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0